Thursday, May 16, 2013

2012-13 Season Review: Goaltending - Average Won't Do

The average age of an NHL starting goaltender this season was 29.1 years so yes, people are right to say that soon to be 26 year old Carey Price is young. In term of years on this planet, Price tied for 23rd youngest among starters with just 3 goalies 1 or more years his junior.

Marc Bergevin was also right to say that goaltenders develop later than all other positions but the age issue is starting to become a bit of a crutch for Carey Price who just finished year 1 of a 6 year contract as the 3rd highest cap hit goaltender in the NHL.

In terms of experience, however, Carey Price isn’t young at all. At least not when you consider that only 10 starting goaltenders this season have more NHL experience than he does, thanks in large part to Bob Gainey’s plan as GM to fast-track his development to The Show.

At first glance, it looks like Carey Price had a bad year, finishing the regular season with a 2.59 GAA and a .905 SA%, thanks in large part to a brutal 4th quarter where Price’s confidence and ability to have strong rebound games went completely off the rails. And yes, that 3.75 GAA and .870 SA% over his last 9 games was brutal… and unfortunately, it carried over into the playoffs.

Hidden in his regular season numbers was the negative impact of the Habs penalty killing unit. Ranked 23rd in PK% and 25th in power play goals against.

It's easy to point fingers at faux problems like PK formations; especially the diamond that happens to be the most commonly used PK formation in the NHL, and for good reason.

What hasn’t been mentioned is Carey’s .804 SA% while killing penalties during the regular season. Not only was it the worst of his 6 year career in Montreal but it was also the worst SA% among the top 30 goaltenders in the NHL this season and by a country mile when you consider the average SA% was .865.

Blame the coaches, formation or player selections all you want but there’s no escaping the fact that Carey Price didn’t come close to doing his part for the team on the PK. So yes, his regular season stats are a bit more representative of his overall performance, though they don’t tell the whole story.

Apples to apples - ES SA% and 5v5 GAA/60

To fully understand his regular season stats, it’s important to look at Price’s even strength SA% and his 5v5 GAA/60. This season, .924 was the league average save percentage at even strength and Carey finished the year at .920. So, slightly less than average.

His 2.07 5v5 GAA/60 is noteworthy for being the 2nd best of his NHL career, which is a definite positive for a team under Marc Bergevin and Michel Therrien that finally took even strength scoring differential seriously for the first time in over 15 years. Better late than never I suppose.

That said, 2.07 ranked as 15th best among starting goaltenders. Before his slump and/or regression, whichever you fancy using in a shortened season small sample size, Carey was 7th through 36 games. Unfortunately, the standard NHL season is much longer than that so if we look at Price's average 5v5 GAA/60 ranking over his career, he slots in at 18th best among starters. So, take your pick between average and slightly less than average.

Since Carey Price came into the NHL in 2007-08, the league average regular season save percentage at even strength is .922. Now with 340 total NHL games of experience, Carey’s ES SA% is slightly above average at .924. So, when you strip away most of the background noise and focus on how he fared on even footing with other starters around the league, Carey Price wasn’t bad this year. He was merely average.

Average, the reoccurring descriptor for Carey Price, even though his cap hit is the 3rd highest among goaltenders and he's now the 11th most experienced starter in the NHL.

“Average won’t do in the playoffs”

Seems obvious but Paul Maurice was dead-on with that line while sitting with the TSN panel during the opening nights of round one. If a goalie can't deliver an upper echelon playoff performance, their team won't go far. Elite goalies find a way to elevate their game when it matters most and are more consistent in doing so over time while others either wilt under the pressure or catch lightning in a bottle for a run that'll never be repeated.

Since 2007-08, the league average playoff save percentage at even strength is .925 which is slightly higher than the .922 regular season rate. Better teams, defense and goaltending all contributing to tighter ES scoring. Carey Price after 30 games of playoff experience? A piss-poor .906. One cannot overstate just how bad that number is when placed in proper context. The fact that Price has only hit the playoff league average in 1 of 5 years is simply unacceptable and alarming given his salary, experience and expectations going forward.

Anyone who suggests that Carey Price hasn’t been a disappointment in the playoffs or blames management, coaches, teammates or points to his youth/inexperience are just fooling themselves and others at this point. In his latest playoff run against the Ottawa Senators, Price made the initial save on just 2 of the 13 goals he allowed over his 4 games. Yet again, not good enough.

Even though the Habs outshot the Ottawa Senators at even strength, 44 to 35 from within 25 feet through those 4 games, Price allowed 7 goals in close for an utterly disappointing .800 SA%. The league average SA% at danger close during the playoffs these days? .900.

Before I proceed further, anyone who puts stock in the NHL’s official stats on shot distance beyond 25 feet simply shouldn’t. They’re crap; useless for any serious study. Last year, while breaking down the Habs shot quality over time for trends, I compared where shots and goals were recorded by the NHL to where they actually occurred on the ice in video highlights and game tape. The difference was often so great that it'd be comical if it weren't for the fact so many people trust the numbers produced by the NHL. It's embarrassing really.

Having said that, shots recorded within 25 feet of the net as a whole (not broken down further) are functionally accurate because of one-timers and the need for a quick release from limited time and space. At least from there, mistakes of 5 feet or so don't change the overall percentages to any notable degree.

A trial balloon has been floated by some that bad luck on shooting percentage was the main reason the Habs didn't send the Senators packing in round one. Truth be told, of the 44 even strength shots the Canadiens got within 25 feet of Anderson during the Price's 4 games; Pacioretty (3), Ryder (3), Gionta (2), Plekanec (1) and Desharnais (1) accounted for just 23% of those shots. Gionta’s injury makes his number understandable and even though Pacioretty was playing with a separated shoulder, he’s a big body that has continued to live on the perimeter regardless.

Leading the way among the forwards crashing the net for close-in shots vs. the Sens was Galchenyuk (9), Bourque (7), Gallagher (4), Prust (4) who I might add was a lot more banged up than Pacioretty, Moen (3), White (2) and Halpern (1). The remaining 4 shots coming from defensemen.

You can't call it bad luck when the Habs best snipers didn't get close enough, often enough, leaving 2 raw rookies and 2 vets in their first full seasons with Montreal to carry the offensive load. It was broad failure by the offensive core of the Montreal Canadiens forwards to commit, pay the price and go where the goals are in the playoffs, not bad luck.  

Anderson's .886 ES SA% close-in vs. Price's .800 SA% made it no contest, especially when you factor in making initial saves on just 2 of his 13 goals against. Fact is, Carey Price was so bad and off his game for weeks leading into the playoffs that even with a healthy roster in the second season, the Habs wouldn’t have been able to generate enough offense to overcome his inconsistent goaltending to win the series.

Does Carey Price have the talent to be a top 5 goalie in the NHL over the next 5 years to justify his salary and expectations? It’s hard to say at this point beyond hoping that he does. So far, Price has just been average when average won't do.

Elite goalies find a way to elevate their game when they matter most but to date, Carey Price hasn’t come close, save for 2010-11. Believing 2 good regular seasons in 6 and just 1 in 5 during the playoffs is a sign of a better tomorrow? That's cold-filtered blind faith right there.

Fact of the matter is, Carey Price has just been average in the regular season and a major disappointment come playoff time. So, until his actual play matches the salary and the expectations placed on him, including Price himself, there will be doubters and concerned Habs fans. And deservedly so. I sincerely hope Carey can elevate his game but growing concerns that he might not are completely justified at this point.

Peter Budaj

This will be short and sweet. Budaj is an average, veteran backup who had a decent regular season though it must be said that 38 goaltenders who played at least as much as he did had a better ES SA%. At just .912 it was well below the .922 league average and an indication he isn't a long term solution if Carey Price ever got knocked out for any length of time.

During the playoffs, Budaj was clearly scared to death in relief of Carey Price. Shaky is his brief OT appearance in Game 4 was understandable but his play in the Habs "Out like lambs" performance in Game 5 was simply embarrassing.




Monday, April 29, 2013

The Era of Declining Power Plays

I've been discussing the decline in power play opportunities and the rise of even strength play on Twitter for a couple years now and wrote a piece about the impact last March, so the main questions I had going into the 2012-13 season was what, if any effect, the lockout and a shortened schedule would have.

In a typical year, team discipline starts off poor and power play units have a significant advantage over the penalty kill the first 4-6 weeks of the season. More power plays generating more power play goals.

However, with just a 6 day mini-camp and no pre-season games this time, teams had to work out the kinks on the fly, magnifying the strain on defensive systems.


The impact of jumping straight into regular season games was significant. Two weeks into the 2012-13 season and fighting majors were up 25%, minor penalties were up 24% and power plays were generating 27% more towards total offense than where they’d ultimately end the year.

Without training camp and pre-season games, it was gong show hockey to start the year with penalty kill units getting hammered with the league average under 80% for weeks. Ultimately, the higher initial spike in power plays and power play goals in a compressed, shortened season would combine to have a masking effect on the end of year averages.


After a 6 year decline in power play opportunities, it would appear they've finally bottomed out with a 0.01 increase over last year but in reality, the season ended too soon to compensate for the higher than normal initial surge in power plays.

Had the weekly split trend continued through 26 weeks instead of the 14 used to squeeze in 58% of a normal season, the power play opportunity rate would have dropped for a 7th consecutive season, likely close to a game average of just 3.20 power plays per team.

So, what does this mean for general managers building for the future and coaches operating in an era where the game is being played at even strength more than at any time in decades?


As we saw with the 3.32 power play opportunity average, the breakdown in player points were also skewed by the higher than normal initial surge to start the season and a shortened schedule. Had there been a standard 82 game season, the top 100 likely would have set another high on even strength points and yet another low on the power play.

Looking at the top 100 point producers, which covers the bulk of the NHL’s best offensive forwards and defensemen, it’s clear that power play points continue to be less of a factor. Simply put, with more of the game being played at even strength, there are fewer opportunities to rack up points on the power play.

While there must be a bottom somewhere or a trigger for the NHL to revamp the rules yet again to generate more offense, it appears we’re not there yet. For a game that seemed comfortable having teams averaging at least 4 power plays a night for a very long time, I can’t imagine the average dropping below 3.

For general managers, the decline in power plays should be having an impact on roster decisions. The Power Play Specialist, code for even strength liability, is starting to become as rare a bird as The Goon, also code for even strength liability.

That’s why a bellwether for me on Marc Bergevin’s path forward is the Montreal Canadiens even strength goal differential, which under Michel Therrien, finished the regular season at +.354. To put that number into context, it’s 69% higher than it’s been in 15 years and close to the +.410 average registered by Stanley Cup winners over that time. In other words, Cup contender territory.

The Habs have had an unhealthy dependence on special teams and have made roster decisions in the past based more on potential power play contributions, in an era of declining power plays, than what they brought to the table at even strength. With at least 77% of total offense these days coming without a man advantage, it appears the Montreal Canadiens have finally woken up to new realities.


Thursday, April 11, 2013

In-depth: Lars Eller vs. David Desharnais

It’s difficult to talk about who’s a better top 2 center for the Montreal Canadiens; David Desharnais or Lars Eller without being labelled a hater of one or both. Fact of the matter is, I’ve long stated that David Desharnais isn’t suited to be a top 2 center on an upper echelon team and fortunately for Habs fans, he isn’t being paid like Marc Bergevin thinks he is.

$3.5 million AAV over the next 4 years is high-end, 3rd line coin and if he eventually moves off the top 2 lines, 40-45 point seasons would be fair value for that investment. If he stays where he is? Forget the predictions of 60+ point seasons and expect 50.

For Lars Eller, can he play well enough, consistently enough to force Michel Therrien into a position where it’s in everyone’s best interest (winning hockey games) to make a change. Say what you will about David Desharnais but he’s now an established hockey player in the NHL and Montreal in particular. Eller came into the 2012-13 season with 28 points as a high water mark on his young career. I projected a breakout year of 35+ points or 20+ over 48 games to be enough to start the conversation on whether he was ready to challenge Desharnais for his top 2 center job and here we are. 

Once a player solidifies (a 60 point season will do that) his position, coaches will do almost anything to buy time for a struggling player to turn his game around. And David Desharnais has surely struggled. Just on power play time alone dating back to last season, Desharnais has played 58 games on the 1st or 2nd unit and has ZERO goals, TWO primary assists and just five seconds to show for it. That’s why I believe 50 point seasons, not a string of 60+ are more likely if he stays on the top 2 lines.

So, with the brass ring within reach, what has Lars Eller done so far this season to force Michel Therrien into making a change and hand Desharnais’s responsibilities, offensive zone starts and power play minutes over to him? Well for starters, a recent 11 and early 10 game stretch without a goal, in a 48 game season, and just 3 points in the 3rd quarter isn't exactly a huge leap towards that ring.

Even with his limited O-zone starts and limited power play time, Eller has generated enough offense, streaky as it may be, to start the conversation about being a 2C. A topic most Habs fans have been waiting to have since the Jaro Halak trade. Thing is, faceoff ability and defensive assignments also matter to play top 2 line minutes.

The fancy stats don't really hold the tale of the tape so I decided to take a look at their faceoff assignments over the last 15 games and see how Eller stacks up against Desharnais with Plekanec thrown in for comparison:


Want to fully understand why the Habs claimed Jeff Halpern off waivers to help boost the PK and defensive depth down the middle? Eller’s piss-poor 39.4% on D-zone draws and just 43.7% overall the last 15 games is why.

A fading FO% with 2 long scoring slumps spanning 21 games isn’t what I call consistency in Eller’s game. Blind cheerleaders may claim it’s a matter of Habs management or Michel Therrien playing favorites but from where I’m sitting, Eller simply hasn’t done enough, consistently enough… at least not yet, to grab the brass ring from David Desharnais.

Since we’re talking about the center position, let’s do a couple apple-to-apple comparisons on faceoffs. People tend to fixate on FO% as if winning 10 of 20 against someone like Patrice Bergeron is the same thing as winning 5 of 10 against Nazem Kadri. When it comes to faceoff percentage, quality of competition has an impact if you want to play a bigger role because the assignments get harder.

I’ve taken 25 centers from the Eastern conference who’ve taken the most faceoffs this season and compared how they did they did in all 3 zones against Eller, Desharnais and Plekanec. Teams who rely on specific players to take most of the draws do so for both offensive and shutdown purposes so it should provide a good balance to look at:


First impression? The next time someone talks about trading Tomas Plekanec, just tell them to shut up. Overall, Plekanec struggles slightly against shutdown centers on faceoffs in the O-zone but 58% against the other teams’ offensive best in his own end is absolutely dominant.

On the season, Plekanec is winning 59.8% of his D-zone draws so while he’s just 1.1% better than David Desharnais on overall FO%, he’s a world ahead when quality of competition is factored in… and that’s why Pleks has taken 150 more draws than anyone else on the team and almost 200 more against the NHL's bigger fish. Blind cheerleaders and fanboys may like simplistic FO% to boost their arguments but coaches make decisions on based on a much deeper level of understanding.

We see further evidence that David Desharnais shouldn’t be a top 2 center but has Lars Eller demonstrated that he’s clearly a better option to force change? No. Eller’s O-zone faceoff sample against the best in the East is small but he’s 55/109 (50.9%) overall on the year, suggesting that 53.3% against the top 25 would slide under 50%, given the time.

In the D-zone, Eller is actually worse than Desharnais against better competition and that’s reflected in their season stats as well where DD is 64/133 (51.9%) vs. Eller’s 81/171 (47.4%). Yet another reminder why the Habs claimed Jeff Halpern off waivers.

So, in a head-to head matchup against the same faceoff men in the Eastern conference, Eller has failed, at least so far, to demonstrate that he’s a better option at a time when David Desharnais is struggling. Sucking slightly less (0.6%) on overall faceoff assignments isn’t usually how center position jobs are won.

Now, let’s drill even deeper and see how they stack up against the 12 best point producers from the batch of 25 who’ve taken the most draws in the East. Those looking to see if Tomas Plekanec is ripe for replacement will be bitterly disappointed.

Plekanec demonstrates yet again that while his season FO% is only slightly better than Desharnais and marginally better than Eller, his ability to shut down the best offensive centers in the Eastern conference is on another level. Fancy stat folk like to believe, as do I, that mere FO% last little impact deciding hockey games but when you drill down into FO Quality of Competition, there is an impact on possession. They tend to see faceoffs being more about luck than skill but when you compare apples to apples, skill matters most.

For Lars Eller, again we see why Michel Therrien has been reluctant to replace David Desharnais. Streaky offense, poor faceoff work the last 15 games and no statement being made, at least so far this season, against quality centers in the East.

That's why I don't believe there's a conspiracy or favorites being played here. Lars Eller simply hasn’t done enough yet to force the Habs into believing he’s a better top 2 center than David Desharnais. Or DD still hasn't sucked enough. Take your pick. That time may come and I hope it does for Eller but for now, it's helps to understand why it hasn't happened. Yet.


Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Paradigm shift: Even strength play makes Habs a Stanley Cup contender

In my preview of the Montreal Canadiens 2012-13 season, I discussed the path the Habs needed to take if the days of 6th to 8th place finishes with "Anything can happen!" playoff marketing were to be no longer considered successful campaigns.

The path was simple but it required a paradigm shift in Montreal: 1. Stop playing passive and start pressuring the opposition all over the ice and 2. Stop making roster decisions regarding power play "specialists" (code for lousy at even strength) and start focusing on players capable of imposing their will on the road at even strength.

In an era of declining penalties, living and dying on special teams is fool's errand but for the last 14+ years, special teams play has been the cornerstone of every short-sighted retooling attempt to turn this franchise around. Until now.

For those who think the Habs success this season is merely the result of remarkable health, take a long look at that chart. For the first time in over 14 years, spanning many relatively healthy seasons, Marc Bergevin and Michel Therrien have elevated the Montreal Canadiens into the realm of Stanley Cup contenders, outscoring opponents so far this season at even strength by almost half a goal a game. That's more than twice what any Habs team has managed to achieve since 1997-98.

Only the Carolina Hurricanes (+0.12) coming out of the lockout in 2005-06 and the Los Angeles Kings (0.0) last season managed to win the Stanley Cup with a low even strength scoring differential since 1997 and none in 14+ years have won a Cup with a negative ES DIF. A depressing mark considering the Habs have been a negative ES team for 10 of them. But hey, anything can happen in the playoffs, right?

Teams built to win on the road have an overwhelming tendency to win at home while teams built to win at home. especially those with an over-reliance on special teams, tend to lose on the road. So, for teams that squeeze into the playoffs and play most of their games on the road and in Game 7's where there's virtually no penalties called, it's easy to see why 86% of Stanley Cup winners since 1997 have won it with strong even strength teams.

Finally, for the 1st time in a very long time, Marc Bergevin and Michel Therrien have turned the Montreal Canadiens into a legitimate Stanley Cup contender, thanks to a paradigm shift that strong even strength teams are better than those built on special teams. Finally indeed.

With a shortened season, it's important to remain a bit cautious about how the Habs system would hold up to  82 games of opposition adjustments and injury but at this point, even a staggering slump would have their even strength play the best it's been since 1997. For Habs fans seeking signs this organization has finally taken the right path forward, this is the best one yet.


Monday, April 8, 2013

Q3 Report Card - Consistency has arrived

Three-quarters through the Habs 2012-13 season, there’s a lot to like about what they’ve achieved so far. Part of that achievement, which cannot be ignored, is the result of staying remarkably healthy as only 3 teams had less salary cap sidelined due to injury than the Canadiens after 36 games; Minnesota, NY Islanders and Anaheim.

Rene Bourque is close to returning to the lineup while Raphael Diaz has finally begun making progress so we’ll see how the loss of Alexei Emelin affects them in Q4 and throughout the playoffs but his physical presence will be sorely missed. One thing is certain though; we’re about see how good the Habs pro scouts were evaluating and targeting Davis Drewiske for just this sort of scenario.

Since hockey is a game of adjustments, looking at the Habs record per quarter and their league statistical rankings reveals one obvious and pleasing trait: Consistency, both at home and on the road. Michel Therrien and his coaching staff have done a fantastic job adjusting to how the opposition prepares and attempts to execute against them.



2012-13 CANADIENS
HOME AWAY
Q W L OT PTS GF GA W L OT W L OT
1 7 4 1 15 35 33 5 3 0 2 1 1
2 8 1 3 19 40 28 3 0 2 5 1 1
3 8 3 1 17 39 28 3 1 1 5 2 0
23 8 5 51 114 89 11 4 3 12 4 2


It’s their continued success on the road at even strength that surprises me most for it’s been far superior to other healthy rosters the Habs have assembled dating all the way back to the 1990s. There’s been a paradigm shift in Montreal to finally put more emphasis on even strength play instead of living and dying on special teams, a facet of the game that’s had shrinking importance deciding hockey games for years anyway. And with that, power play specialists like Tomas Kaberle and Yannick Weber lost playing time to stronger even strength defensemen though summer buy-out protection on Kaberle has also played a role.



LEAGUE RANKINGS
CATEGORY Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Goals Scored / Game 10 4 5
Goals Against / Game 16 10 7
5v5 Ratio 14 3 3
Power Play 9 9 9
Penalty Kill 17 14 13
Shots / Game 13 8 9
Shots Against / Game 12 4 6
Faceoffs 28 23 21
Power Play Time 3 1 1
Penalty Kill Time 27 13 17
Penalties 29 26 25
Blocked Shots 20 16 14
Missed Shots 11 13 11
Hits 12 14 17
Takeaways 16 17 21
Giveaways 7 9 9


Lots of consistency and areas of improvement means this coaching staff is capable of making adjustments which has gone a long way towards preventing prolonged losing steaks.

Power Play Differential

Even in a shortened season, power plays are drying up as they have for years and the recipe has been the same: A two week flurry of power plays to start the season, brought on by a lot of really bad hockey, followed by a steadily decline in called penalties the rest of the season.

Good thing the Habs have been dramatically better at even strength. Just in the last quarter, their power play opportunities per game average dropped a staggering .42 to 4.18 which is still above the per team league average of just 3.40 power plays a night. Thankfully, a more aggressive forecheck and moderately improved discipline has kept the Habs power play above water with a special teams surplus (PP-PK) of +22 opportunities, a far cry from the -50 racked up by Jacques Martin during his 1st year in Montreal.

Even Strength Differential

With a road-heavy schedule, including a stretch of 11 of 15 away from the Bell Centre, the Canadiens still managed to score an average of 2.19 even strength goals per game, down slightly from 2.27 but still good enough to be 6th best in the NHL. They’ve also given up the 6th fewest even strength goals against at just 1.70, down from 1.73 in Q2.

Considering that 76.7% of total offense at the end of Q3 was scored without a man advantage, having a +.486 even strength scoring differential, 3rd best in the NHL behind Pittsburgh and Anaheim  is THE reason why the Habs are where they are in the standings. Being the 7th best team in the NHL outshooting opponents 5v5 has been a major factor improving their even strength game. 
  
Player Thoughts

While Travis Moen and Colby Armstrong have played a big role cutting even strength and power play goals against, Marc Bergevin tried at least twice (Clowe and Torres) at the trading deadline to bolster the Habs depth on the wing, namely down the left side which was clearly a shot across the bow of Travis Moen’s job security. Brandon Prust is what Moen once was when he first arrived from Anaheim and Marc Bergevin must be a little disappointed in Moen’s overall game after signing him to a 4 year contract.

The knee injury to Colby Armstrong buys time for Ryan White to save his job. He must raise his physical game and play smart as most long-tenured energy players do. Taking penalties is okay… if you take a better player off with you though earning power play opportunities for your team by getting under the skin of opponents is even better. White has to get back to that to remain in Montreal.

P.K. Subban has arrived. Appreciating a legitimate Norris Trophy candidate at the ripe old age of 23 who just happens to be the most talented Canadiens defenseman since Chris Chelios runs the risk of being labelled a blind cheerleader these days. I’m pretty sure most Habs fans see a net-positive risk taker, capable of racking up points while shutting down the opposition’s best for what he is; an elite talent that’s only getting better. For the few that don’t want to see it or simply can’t without obsessing on diminishing negatives, it’s just a shame.

Michael Ryder might be 33 and a pending UFA but he certainly warrants a 2 year contract offer from Marc Bergevin. The biggest difference I’ve seen in Ryder since he last suited up for the Habs is how much better he’s gotten defensively. His hand-eye coordination to tip pucks is still phenomenal and his one-timer from the slot is still excellent. Going long term on a 33 year old would be very risky but I’m sure there’s at least one team out there that’ll throw a 4 year deal Ryder’s way. Hopefully, Bergevin can sign him before silly season kicks off in July.

If Lars Eller wants to fulfill everyone’s hopes and dreams that he’s a capable, second line center trapped on a 3rd line, he should learn from Brendan Gallagher who is just the latest example that consistency and determination are fantastic when mixed with speed and skill. Gallagher’s consistent play all season forced the Habs to give him more ice-time and a greater responsibility and in-part, created the opportunity to trade Erik Cole.

A hockey team may be a family but there’s always internal competition for jobs and TOI so if Eller wants to move up the lines, it’ll have to come by outperforming David Desharnais and forcing the Habs to do something about it. Lack of consistency at both ends of the ice, on the PK and on faceoffs where Eller won just 44.8% of his Q3 draws not only failed to challenge Desharnais in any way, it forced Bergevin to claim Jeff Halpern off waivers. 

Therrien finally has Eller playing a more physical game so there’s hope the consistency will come. If it does, Eller will go from 40 point territory to 55+ in a hurry. If it doesn't happen, Bergevin will be tempted to package Eller for someone who can push Desharnais for ice time because as much as people think he's being protected, $3.5 million isn't top 6 money.



FORWARDS
MAX PACIORETTY (A)
On pace for another career season, thanks to Gallagher replacing Cole on his line.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 5 0 3 3 -1 10 7 2 0 1 0.0% 0 2 0 0 0 17 0.000
1 A 3 0 3 3 -1 2 4 1 0 0 0.0% 0 2 0 0 0 8 0.000
Q1 8 0 6 6 -2 12 11 3 0 1 0.0% 0 4 0 0 0 25 0.000
2 H 5 4 4 8 4 4 2 2 0 1 0.0% 1 0 0 0 0 21 0.190
2 A 7 4 2 6 4 2 8 1 0 1 0.0% 1 1 0 0 0 26 0.154
Q2 12 8 6 14 8 6 10 3 0 2 0.0% 2 1 0 0 0 47 0.170
3 H 5 3 1 4 -1 2 6 3 1 1 50.0% 0 1 0 0 0 28 0.107
3 A 7 0 6 6 1 0 7 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 21 0.000
Q3 12 3 7 10 0 2 13 4 1 1 50.0% 0 1 0 0 0 49 0.061
2012-13 32 11 19 30 6 20 34 10 1 4 20.0% 2 6 0 0 0 121 0.091
MICHAEL RYDER (A)
Simply put, exceeding all expectations. Now 33, well worth a short term contract.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
2 H 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
2 A 4 0 4 4 -3 2 1 1 0 2 0.0% 0 3 0 0 0 5 0.000
Q2 5 0 4 4 -3 2 1 1 0 2 0.0% 0 3 0 0 0 7 0.000
3 H 5 2 0 2 1 0 2 6 0 0 0.0% 1 0 0 0 1 10 0.200
3 A 6 5 3 8 1 4 4 1 0 0 0.0% 3 0 0 0 0 21 0.238
Q3 11 7 3 10 2 4 6 7 0 0 0.0% 4 0 0 0 1 31 0.226
2012-13 16 7 7 14 -1 6 7 8 0 2 0.0% 4 3 0 0 1 38 0.184
TOMAS PLEKANEC (A)
Having his best season in 3 years, one of the NHL's best two-way centers is back.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 2 4 6 -4 6 1 1 80 89 47.3% 1 3 0 0 1 20 0.100
1 A 4 4 1 5 1 2 1 2 41 50 45.1% 2 1 0 0 0 18 0.222
Q1 12 6 5 11 -3 8 2 3 121 139 46.5% 3 4 0 0 1 38 0.158
2 H 5 2 0 2 2 4 4 3 53 40 57.0% 0 0 0 0 0 16 0.125
2 A 7 2 0 2 0 4 7 4 71 75 48.6% 1 0 0 0 0 24 0.083
Q2 12 4 0 4 2 8 11 7 124 115 51.9% 1 0 0 0 0 40 0.100
3 H 5 1 2 3 2 0 1 3 54 53 50.5% 0 1 0 0 0 15 0.067
3 A 7 2 7 9 5 2 3 1 68 67 50.4% 0 4 0 0 1 13 0.154
Q3 12 3 9 12 7 2 4 4 122 120 50.4% 0 5 0 0 1 28 0.107
2012-13 36 13 14 27 6 18 17 14 367 374 49.5% 4 9 0 0 2 106 0.123
DAVID DESHARNAIS (C)
With his inability to generate PP offense on the road, he'll be lucky to have 50 pt seasons.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 3 2 5 -2 12 1 3 56 75 42.7% 1 2 0 0 0 10 0.300
1 A 4 0 0 0 -4 0 2 4 30 29 50.8% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
Q1 12 3 2 5 -6 12 3 7 86 104 45.3% 1 2 0 0 0 13 0.231
2 H 5 2 3 5 2 4 1 1 45 43 51.1% 0 1 0 0 1 7 0.286
2 A 7 2 3 5 3 0 7 2 48 47 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 17 0.118
Q2 12 4 6 10 5 4 8 3 93 90 50.8% 0 1 0 0 2 24 0.167
3 H 5 0 1 1 -1 2 0 6 46 40 53.5% 0 1 0 0 0 11 0.000
3 A 7 2 4 6 2 2 2 1 55 59 48.2% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.333
Q3 12 2 5 7 1 4 2 7 101 99 50.5% 0 1 0 0 0 17 0.118
2012-13 36 9 13 22 0 20 13 17 280 293 48.9% 1 4 0 0 2 54 0.167
BRENDAN GALLAGHER (A)
Most rookies fade as the season progresses but Gally has only gotten better.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 7 3 2 5 4 11 17 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 1 19 0.158
1 A 4 1 0 1 1 4 6 2 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.200
Q1 11 4 2 6 5 15 23 4 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 1 24 0.167
2 H 3 1 3 4 2 2 4 1 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.143
2 A 6 1 2 3 3 2 2 5 2 2 50.0% 0 0 0 0 1 20 0.050
Q2 9 2 5 7 5 4 6 6 2 4 33.3% 0 0 0 0 1 27 0.074
3 H 5 2 2 4 -1 0 3 5 1 3 25.0% 2 1 0 0 0 13 0.154
3 A 7 3 1 4 1 2 1 5 2 4 33.3% 0 0 0 0 1 22 0.136
Q3 12 5 3 8 0 2 4 10 3 7 30.0% 2 1 0 0 1 35 0.143
2012-13 32 11 10 21 10 21 33 20 6 13 31.6% 2 1 0 0 3 86 0.128
BRIAN GIONTA (B)
Solid comeback season for Gionta. Keeping legs fresh without PK work this season.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 1 2 3 -2 0 13 3 3 5 37.5% 1 1 0 0 0 21 0.048
1 A 4 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 6 14.3% 1 0 0 0 0 10 0.200
Q1 12 3 3 6 -1 2 16 4 4 11 26.7% 2 1 0 0 0 31 0.097
2 H 5 2 2 4 2 0 2 1 1 3 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 15 0.133
2 A 7 2 0 2 -2 2 4 7 2 3 40.0% 1 0 0 0 0 18 0.111
Q2 12 4 2 6 0 2 6 8 3 6 33.3% 1 0 0 0 0 33 0.121
3 H 5 0 1 1 2 0 3 1 3 3 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.000
3 A 7 3 4 7 4 0 2 1 2 2 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 14 0.214
Q3 12 3 5 8 6 0 5 2 5 5 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 25 0.120
2012-13 36 10 10 20 5 4 27 14 12 22 35.3% 3 1 0 0 2 89 0.112
LARS ELLER (C)
Won't be a 2C in Montreal without more consistency. FO% dip why they acquired Halpern.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 7 1 2 3 0 6 14 6 27 28 49.1% 0 1 0 0 0 16 0.063
1 A 3 0 2 2 0 0 5 2 12 15 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
Q1 10 1 4 5 0 6 19 8 39 43 47.6% 0 1 0 0 0 22 0.045
2 H 5 1 4 5 4 4 8 1 32 27 54.2% 1 0 0 0 0 5 0.200
2 A 7 1 3 4 1 8 12 5 51 47 52.0% 0 1 0 0 1 10 0.100
Q2 12 2 7 9 5 12 20 6 83 74 52.9% 1 1 0 0 1 15 0.133
3 H 5 1 1 2 0 0 9 4 34 28 54.8% 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.091
3 A 7 0 1 1 -4 8 16 7 31 52 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.000
Q3 12 1 2 3 -4 8 25 11 65 80 44.8% 0 0 0 0 0 28 0.036
2012-13 34 4 13 17 1 26 64 25 187 197 48.7% 1 2 0 0 1 65 0.062
ALEX GALCHENYUK (C)
Chuckie hit the rookie wall hard. Must find a way to double his shots on net to break out.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 1 6 7 6 4 2 3 26 34 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.071
1 A 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 23 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.000
Q1 12 1 6 7 6 4 2 3 44 57 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 18 0.056
2 H 5 1 2 3 1 6 1 6 2 3 40.0% 0 1 0 0 0 11 0.091
2 A 7 1 2 3 0 0 6 3 6 5 54.5% 0 0 0 0 1 9 0.111
Q2 12 2 4 6 1 6 7 9 8 8 50.0% 0 1 0 0 1 20 0.100
3 H 5 0 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 4 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.000
3 A 7 0 2 2 0 4 6 5 1 4 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.000
Q3 12 0 3 3 1 6 9 7 2 8 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.000
2012-13 36 3 13 16 8 16 18 19 54 73 42.5% 0 1 0 0 1 58 0.052
BRANDON PRUST (B)
Playing solid, two-way hockey but tender shoulder will affect his physical game.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 1 1 2 4 41 20 4 10 13 43.5% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.167
1 A 4 0 1 1 0 28 3 2 2 6 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.000
Q1 12 1 2 3 4 69 23 6 12 19 38.7% 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.091
2 H 5 2 0 2 2 7 9 4 7 6 53.8% 0 0 0 0 1 6 0.333
2 A 7 1 3 4 7 5 28 6 5 4 55.6% 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.100
Q2 12 3 3 6 9 12 37 10 12 10 54.5% 0 0 0 0 1 16 0.188
3 H 2 0 0 0 -1 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
3 A 2 1 0 1 0 5 4 2 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.333
Q3 4 1 0 1 -1 5 5 4 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.167
2012-13 28 5 5 10 12 86 65 20 24 30 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 33 0.152
RENE BOURQUE (B)
Should be back from concussion with about 2 weeks to get settled before the playoffs.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 3 1 4 -2 16 14 3 0 1 0.0% 2 1 0 0 0 21 0.143
1 A 4 0 3 3 1 6 4 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.000
Q1 12 3 4 7 -1 22 18 4 0 1 0.0% 2 1 0 0 0 34 0.088
2 H 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.500
2 A 2 1 0 1 1 2 3 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 1 5 0.200
Q2 5 2 1 3 1 2 3 4 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 1 7 0.286
3 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 17 5 5 10 0 24 21 8 0 1 0.0% 2 1 0 0 1 41 0.122
COLBY ARMSTRONG (C)
A knee injury could end Armdog's season, just as he was playing his best hockey.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 0 0 0 1 2 5 2 5 3 62.5% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.000
1 A 4 0 1 1 -1 4 9 4 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.000
Q1 12 0 1 1 0 6 14 6 5 3 62.5% 0 0 0 0 0 12 0.000
2 H 5 0 1 1 1 2 4 2 1 3 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
2 A 7 0 1 1 -3 0 5 7 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
Q2 12 0 2 2 -2 2 9 9 2 5 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.000
3 H 5 1 0 1 3 4 4 2 1 3 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.143
3 A 6 1 0 1 1 0 7 3 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.143
Q3 11 2 0 2 4 4 11 5 1 4 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.143
2012-13 35 2 3 5 2 12 34 20 8 12 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 31 0.065
TRAVIS MOEN (D)
Strong work at ES and on the PK is no longer enough. Expect a trade this summer.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 0 1 1 0 9 13 5 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
1 A 3 1 0 1 0 5 1 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.500
Q1 11 1 1 2 0 14 14 6 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.125
2 H 5 1 0 1 1 2 9 6 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.200
2 A 7 0 1 1 -3 0 15 1 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q2 12 1 1 2 -2 2 24 7 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.200
3 H 5 0 0 0 1 2 6 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
3 A 7 0 0 0 -1 14 17 1 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
Q3 12 0 0 0 0 16 23 2 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
2012-13 35 2 2 4 -2 32 61 15 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 19 0.105
JEFF HALPERN (C)
Can Halpern's near 37 year old body handle 16 +/- shutdown minutes a night?
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
3 H 2 1 0 1 2 0 4 1 17 12 58.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1 1.000
3 A 3 0 1 1 -1 0 6 2 25 24 51.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
Q3 5 1 1 2 1 0 10 3 42 36 53.8% 0 0 0 0 1 3 0.333
2012-13 5 1 1 2 1 0 10 3 42 36 53.8% 0 0 0 0 1 3 0.333
GABRIEL DUMONT (C)
Only lack of discipline will keep Dumont off the roster, at the expense of Ryan White.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
3 H 3 0 1 1 1 2 5 0 7 6 53.8% 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.000
3 A 5 0 1 1 -1 11 11 6 21 10 67.7% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
Q3 8 0 2 2 0 13 16 6 28 16 63.6% 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.000
2012-13 8 0 2 2 0 13 16 6 28 16 63.6% 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.000
RYAN WHITE (F)
Glorious opportunity this season to finally secure a roster position has been wasted.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 4 1 0 1 1 29 5 1 16 10 61.5% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.200
1 A 3 0 0 0 0 17 10 0 12 6 66.7% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.000
Q1 7 1 0 1 1 46 15 1 28 16 63.6% 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.111
2 H 4 0 0 0 1 2 8 6 16 18 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2 A 6 0 0 0 -1 2 9 3 19 22 46.3% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
Q2 10 0 0 0 0 4 17 9 35 40 46.7% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
3 H 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 4 7 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
3 A 3 0 0 0 1 2 4 3 17 6 73.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 5 0 0 0 1 2 8 5 21 13 61.8% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
2012-13 22 1 0 1 2 52 40 15 84 69 54.9% 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.077
MIKE BLUNDEN (C)
Fringe NHL'er keeping a roster spot warm for Danny Kristo.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
3 H 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.000
3 A 3 0 0 0 -1 2 1 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
Q3 4 0 0 0 -1 4 2 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.000
2012-13 4 0 0 0 -1 4 2 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.000
DEFENSE
P.K. SUBBAN (A)
Few Norris trophy candidates are 23. Plays complete game at speed & will only get better.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 4 1 2 3 1 6 5 7 0 0 0.0% 1 1 0 0 0 9 0.111
1 A 2 2 1 3 -1 0 3 1 0 0 0.0% 1 1 0 0 0 4 0.500
Q1 6 3 3 6 0 6 8 8 0 0 0.0% 2 2 0 0 0 13 0.231
2 H 5 1 2 3 4 4 4 5 0 0 0.0% 0 2 0 0 0 16 0.063
2 A 7 2 4 6 -3 2 13 8 0 0 0.0% 2 3 0 0 0 22 0.091
Q2 12 3 6 9 1 6 17 13 0 0 0.0% 2 5 0 0 0 38 0.079
3 H 5 1 5 6 2 12 8 6 0 0 0.0% 1 3 0 0 0 14 0.071
3 A 7 3 4 7 7 2 10 12 0 0 0.0% 1 3 0 0 0 23 0.130
Q3 12 4 9 13 9 14 18 18 0 0 0.0% 2 6 0 0 0 37 0.108
2012-13 30 10 18 28 10 26 43 39 0 0 0.0% 6 13 0 0 0 88 0.114
ANDREI MARKOV (B)
Lost a step but has adjusted well. Emelin eases need to play physical, which is a plus.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 3 3 6 -1 6 5 13 0 0 0.0% 3 3 0 0 2 10 0.300
1 A 4 1 3 4 -1 0 1 10 0 0 0.0% 1 3 0 0 1 6 0.167
Q1 12 4 6 10 -2 6 6 23 0 0 0.0% 4 6 0 0 3 16 0.250
2 H 5 0 1 1 1 2 0 4 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.000
2 A 7 1 3 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0.0% 1 3 0 0 0 15 0.067
Q2 12 1 4 5 1 2 4 8 0 0 0.0% 1 3 0 0 0 23 0.043
3 H 5 1 4 5 0 2 1 9 0 0 0.0% 1 2 0 0 0 10 0.100
3 A 7 1 3 4 -2 0 5 12 0 0 0.0% 1 2 0 0 0 10 0.100
Q3 12 2 7 9 -2 2 6 21 0 0 0.0% 2 4 0 0 0 20 0.100
2012-13 36 7 17 24 -3 10 16 52 0 0 0.0% 7 13 0 0 3 59 0.119
RAPHAEL DIAZ (B)
Might be back just in time for the playoffs. Habs need his shot on the 2nd PP unit.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 0 5 5 0 4 5 12 0 0 0.0% 0 4 0 0 0 14 0.000
1 A 4 0 4 4 0 0 2 9 0 0 0.0% 0 2 0 0 0 6 0.000
Q1 12 0 9 9 0 4 7 21 0 0 0.0% 0 6 0 0 0 20 0.000
2 H 4 0 2 2 3 0 1 7 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.000
2 A 3 1 1 2 2 0 1 7 0 0 0.0% 0 1 0 0 0 5 0.200
Q2 7 1 3 4 5 0 2 14 0 0 0.0% 0 1 0 0 0 9 0.111
3 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 19 1 12 13 5 4 9 35 0 0 0.0% 0 7 0 0 0 29 0.034
ALEXEI EMELIN (B)
It's been a rough quarter for Emelin. Ill-advised fights and hits dropped off.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 0 1 1 -2 2 37 5 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
1 A 4 0 1 1 2 4 10 5 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.000
Q1 12 0 2 2 0 6 47 10 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
2 H 5 0 3 3 2 0 13 7 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.000
2 A 7 1 2 3 3 9 26 6 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.125
Q2 12 1 5 6 5 9 39 13 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 15 0.067
3 H 5 0 0 0 2 7 10 9 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.000
3 A 7 2 2 4 -5 6 9 12 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.500
Q3 12 2 2 4 -3 13 19 21 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.222
2012-13 36 3 9 12 2 28 105 44 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 30 0.100
JOSH GORGES (B)
Solid season for Gorges, except PK due to pairings with Bouillon, Diaz and now Drewiske.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 0 0 0 -2 9 9 24 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
1 A 4 1 0 1 0 0 4 11 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.200
Q1 12 1 0 1 -2 9 13 35 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.125
2 H 5 0 1 1 2 2 15 9 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
2 A 7 1 3 4 4 2 7 16 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.125
Q2 12 1 4 5 6 4 22 25 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.100
3 H 5 0 1 1 -2 0 10 17 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
3 A 7 0 0 0 4 0 7 9 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
Q3 12 0 1 1 2 0 17 26 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.000
2012-13 36 2 5 7 6 13 52 86 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 27 0.074
FRANCIS BOUILLON (C)
Playing a solid defensive game as a 6/7 D and mentor but shouldn't be on the power play.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 8 0 3 3 5 2 16 6 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.000
1 A 4 0 1 1 -4 2 7 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.000
Q1 12 0 4 4 1 4 23 8 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 12 0.000
2 H 5 0 1 1 1 0 4 6 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2 A 7 0 0 0 0 4 12 10 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
Q2 12 0 1 1 1 4 16 16 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
3 H 5 0 1 1 3 2 15 4 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.000
3 A 7 1 1 2 1 0 12 10 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.167
Q3 12 1 2 3 4 2 27 14 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.091
2012-13 36 1 7 8 6 10 66 38 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.034
TOMAS KABERLE (F)
Bergevin might break the sound barrier to be 1st at the buyout window this summer.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 4 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.000
1 A 2 0 0 0 -1 0 1 3 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.000
Q1 6 0 1 1 2 0 2 4 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.000
2 H 1 0 2 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
2 A 3 0 0 0 -1 0 0 6 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
Q2 4 0 2 2 2 0 0 7 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.000
3 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 10 0 3 3 4 0 2 11 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.000
YANNICK WEBER (F)
Lost his job to Diaz and under regime of defensive responsibility, won't be back.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
1 H 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
1 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2 A 1 0 0 0 -1 2 2 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q2 1 0 0 0 -1 2 2 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
3 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 2 0 0 0 -1 2 3 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
DAVIS DREWISKE (C)
Gorges latest PK partner in an attempt to improve special teams. Good shot-blocker.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
3 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
3 A 1 0 0 0 -1 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 1 0 0 0 -1 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 1 0 0 0 -1 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
JARRED TINORDI (C)
Solid call-up to see where Tinordi's development is. Should fill Drewiske's spot next year.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
3 H 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.000
3 A 4 0 1 1 2 0 2 3 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.000
Q3 6 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.000
2012-13 6 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.000
NATHAN BEAULIEU (C)
The offensive talent and vision are NHL ready. Just needs to be better defensively.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
3 H 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.000
2012-13 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.000
GREG PATERYN (C)
Likely a career AHL'er, unless he can stay ahead of Morgan Ellis on the depth chart.
Q H/A GP G A Pts +/- PIM Hits BkS FW FL FO% PPG PPA SHG SHA GW SOG Pct
3 H 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
3 A 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
Q3 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000



GOALTENDERS
CAREY PRICE (A)
With the 5th best 5v5 GAA/60 in the NHL, he's now among the elite.
Q H/A GP GS MIN W L OTL EGA GA GAA SA SV SV% SO
1 H 8 8 482 5 3 0 0 19 2.37 215 196 0.912 0
1 A 2 2 125 2 0 0 0 4 1.92 55 51 0.927 0
Q1 10 10 607 7 3 0 0 23 2.27 270 247 0.915 0
2 H 3 3 184 1 0 2 0 11 3.59 78 67 0.859 1
2 A 6 6 366 4 1 1 1 11 1.80 164 153 0.933 1
Q2 9 9 550 5 1 3 1 22 2.40 242 220 0.909 2
3 H 5 5 306 3 1 1 0 9 1.76 124 115 0.927 1
3 A 6 6 339 3 2 0 1 15 2.65 167 152 0.910 0
Q3 11 11 645 6 3 1 1 24 2.23 291 267 0.918 1
2012-13 30 30 1802 18 7 4 2 69 2.30 803 734 0.914 3
PETER BUDAJ (B)
The SA% is a concern but he's done the job when needed.
Q H/A GP GS MIN W L OTL EGA GA GAA SA SV SV% SO
1 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0
1 A 2 2 125 0 1 1 0 9 4.32 67 58 0.866 0
Q1 2 2 125 0 1 1 0 9 4.32 67 58 0.866 0
2 H 2 2 120 2 0 0 0 1 0.50 38 37 0.974 1
2 A 1 1 60 1 0 0 0 3 3.00 34 31 0.912 0
Q2 3 3 180 3 0 0 0 4 1.33 72 68 0.944 1
3 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0
3 A 2 1 84 2 0 0 0 3 2.14 31 28 0.903 0
Q3 2 1 84 2 0 0 0 3 2.14 31 28 0.903 0
2012-13 7 6 389 5 1 1 0 16 2.47 170 154 0.906 1